Исследование предвестников землетрясения путем электромагнитного мониторинга: ИНЧ сигналы как потенциальные предвестники землетрясения

Исследование предвестников землетрясения путем электромагнитного мониторинга: ИНЧ сигналы как потенциальные предвестники землетрясения
Номер: 29 Год: 2021 Страницы: 30-37

УДК: 550.83

EDN: NBVKDE

Автор(ы):

Пириев Рахман Хаким Оглы^1,2, e-mail: rahmanpiriyev@bsu.edu.az

Учреждения:
1 - Бакинский государственный университет, акад. Улица Захида Халилова, 23, AZ 1148. Баку, Азербайджан
2 - Научно-исследовательский и проектный институт нефти и газа Socar, Баку, Азербайджан

Аннотация:
В течение последних лет неоднократно предпринимались попытки рассматривать изменение электромагнитного поля Земли, равно как и электромагнитные явления, предшествующие землетрясению, в качестве его предвестников. Как потенциальные предвестники землетрясения часто рассматриваются электромагнитные сигналы крайне низких частот (КНЧ). Поэтому особое внимание уделено тем статьям, где сигналы КНЧ рассматриваются как перспективные предвестники. Сделаны обзоры статьи Карри и Уотерса [Currie and Waters, 2014], исследования основных землетрясений Лома-Приеты и Гуама [Loma Prieta, and Guam], а также исследования мегаземлетрясения в Тохоку (Япония) (напр., Hayakawa and Fujinawa, 1994; Hayakawa, 1996, 1999; Campbell, 2009; Fraser-Smith и др., 2011; Molchanov и др., 1992; Hobara и др., 2004; Ida и др., 2005; Surkov and Hayakawa, 2014). В качестве вывода, предлагается рассматривать подход, основанный на КНЧ, в качестве наилучшего подхода к прогнозированию землетрясений (краткосрочный прогноз).

Ключевые слова: ЭЛЕКТРОМАГНИТНЫЙ, ЗЕМЛЕТРЯСЕНИЕ, КНЧ, ПРЕДВЕСТНИК, КРАТКОСРОЧНЫЙ ПРОГНОЗ

Сведения об источниках финансирования: -

Скачать текст Ссылка на цитирование Ссылка на Elibrary

1. Bernardi A., Fraser-Smith A.C., McGill P.R., Villard O.G. ULF magnetic field measurements near the epicenter of the Ms 7.1 Loma Prieta earthquake // Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 1991. V.68. Pp.45–63. 2. Campbell W.H. Natural magnetic disturbance fields, not precursors, preceding the Loma Prieta earthquake // J. Geophys. Res. 2009. V.114. A05307. DOI:10.1029/2008JA013932. 3. Chen C.H., Wen S., Liu J.Y., Hattori K., Han P., Hobara Y., Wang C.H., Yeh T.K., Yen H.Y. Surface displacements in Japan before the 11 March 2011 M9.0 Tōhoku-Oki earthquake // J. Asian Earth Sci. 2013. V.80. Pp.165–171. 4. Currie J.L., Waters C.L. On the use of geomagnetic indices and ULF waves for earthquake precursor signatures // J. Geophys. Res. Space Physics. 2014. V.119. Pp.992–1003. DOI:10.1002/2013JA019530. 5. Fraser-Smith A.C., Bernardi A., McGill P.R., Ladd M.E., Helliwell R.A., Villard O.G. Low-frequency magnetic field measurements near the epicenter of the Loma-Prieta earthquake // Geophys. Res. Lett. 1990. V.17. Pp.1465–1468. 6. Fraser-Smith A.C., McGill P.R., Bernardi A. Comment on "Natural magnetic disturbance fields, not precursors, preceding the Loma Prieta earthquake" by Wallace H. Campbell // J. Geophys. Res. 2011. V.116. A08228. DOI:10.1029/2010JA016379. 7. Hasbi A.M., Mohd M.A., Misran N. Ionospheric variations before some large earthquakes over Sumatra // Nat. Hazard. Earth Syst. Sci. 2011. V.11. No.2. Pp.597–611. 8. Hayakawa M. (ed.) Atmospheric and Ionospheric Electromagnetic Phenomena Associated with Earthquakes. Tokyo: Terra Scientific Publishing, 1999. 996 p. 9. Hayakawa M., Fujinawa Y. (Eds.) Electromagnetic Phenomena Related to Earthquake Prediction. Tokyo: Terra Sci. Pub. Co., 1994. 667 p. 10. Hayakawa M., Hobara Y., Yasuda Y., Yamaguchi H., Ohta K., Izutsu J., Nakamura T. Possible precursor to March 11, 2011, Japan earthquake: Ionospheric perturbations as seen by subionospheric very low frequency/low-frequency propagation // Ann. Geophys. 2012. V.55. No.1. Pp.95–99. 11. Hayakawa M., Itoh T., Smirnova N. Fractal analysis of ULF geomagnetic data associated with the Guam earthquake on August 8, 1993 // Geophys. Res. Lett. 1999. V.26. No.18. Pp.2797–2800. 12. Hayakawa M., Kasahara Y., Nakamura T., Muto F., Horie T., Maekawa S., Hobara Y., Rozhnoi A.A., Solivieva M., Molchanov O.A. A statistical study on the correlation between lower ionospheric perturbations as seen by subionospheric VLF/LF propagation and earthquakes // J. Geophys. Res. 2010. V.115. A09305. 13. Hayakawa M., Kawate R., Molchanov O.A., Yumoto K. Results of ultra-low-frequency magnetic field measurements during the Guam earthquake of 8 August 1993 // Geophys. Res. Lett. 1996. V.23. No.3. Pp.241–244. DOI:10.1029/95GL02863. 14. Hayakawa M., Molchanov O.A., Ondoh T., Kawai E. The precursory signature effect of the Kobe earthquake on VLF subionospheric signals // J. Comm. Res. Lab. 1996. V.43. Pp.169–180. 15. Hayakawa M., Hobara Y., Rozhnoi A., Solovieva M., Ohta K., Izutsu J., Nakamura T., Kasahara Y. The ionospheric precursor to the 2011 March 11 earthquake based upon observations obtained from the Japan-Pacific subionospheric VLF/LF network // Terr. Atmos. Ocean. Sci. 2013. V.24. No.3. Pp.393–408. DOI:10.3319/TAO.2012.12.14.01(AA). 16. Hayakawa M., Rozhnoi A., Solovieva M., Hobara Y., Ohta K., Schekotov A., Fedorov E. The lower ionospheric perturbation as a precursor to the 11 March 2011 Japan earthquake // Geomatics, Nat. Hazards Risk. 2013. V.4. No.3. Pp.275–287. DOI:10.1080/19475705.2012.751938. 17. Hayakawa M., Schekotov A., Potirakis S., Eftaxias K. Criticality features in ULF magnetic fields prior to the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake // Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. B. 2015. V.91. Pp.25–30. DOI:10.2183/pjab.91.25. 18. Heki K. Ionospheric electron enhancement preceding the 2011 Tōhoku-Oki earthquake // Geophys. Res. Lett. 2011. V.38. L17312. 19. Hobara Y., Koons H.C., Roeder J.L., Yumoto K., Hayakawa M. Characteristics of ULF magnetic anomaly before earthquakes // Phys. Chem. Earth. 2004. V.29. Pp.437–444. DOI:10.1016/j.pce.2003.12.005. 20. Ida Y., Hayakawa M. Fractal analysis for the ULF data during the 1993 Guam earthquake to study prefecture criticality // Nonlinear Processes Geophys. 2006. V.13. Pp.409–412. DOI:10.5194/npg-13-409-2006. 21. Ida Y., Hayakawa M., Adalev A., Gotoh K. Multifractal analysis for the ULF Geomagnetic data during the 1993 Guam earthquake // Nonlinear Processes Geophys. 2005. V.12. Pp.157–162. DOI:10.5194/npg-12-157-2005. 22. Kamiyama M., Sugito M., Kuse M., Chekotov A., Hayakawa M. On the precursors to the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake: crustal movements and electromagnetic signatures // Geomatics, Nat. Hazards Risk. 2014. DOI:10.1080/19475705.2014.937773. 23. Kamogawa M., Kakinami Y. Is an ionospheric electron enhancement preceding the 2011 Tōhoku-Oki earthquake a precursor? // J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2013. V.118. Pp.1751–1754. 24. Kopytenko Yu.A., Ismaguilov V.S., Hattori K., Hayakawa M. Anomaly disturbances of the magnetic fields before the strong earthquake in Japan on March 11, 2011 // Ann. Geophys. 2012. V.55. No.1. Pp.101–107. DOI:10.4401/ag-5260. 25. Kopytenko Yu.A., Matiashvili T.G., Voronov P.M., Kopytenko E.A., Molchanov O.A. Discovering of ultra-low-frequency emissions connected with Spitak earthquake and its aftershock activity with the data of geomagnetic pulsations observations at Dusheti and Vardzija. Moscow: IZMIRAN, 1990. Preprint N3(888). 27 p. 26. Masci F. On the seismogenic increase of the ratio of the ULF geomagnetic field components // Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 2011. V.187. Pp.19–32. DOI:10.1016/j.pepi.2011.05.001. 27. Masci F. Brief communication "On the recent reaffirmation of ULF magnetic earthquakes precursors" // Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2011. V.11. Pp.2193–2198. DOI:10.5194/nhess-11-2193-2011. 28. Masci F. Comment on "Ultra-low frequency (ULF) European multi-station magnetic field analysis before and during the 2009 earthquake at L'Aquila regarding regional geotechnical information" by Prattes et al. (2011) // Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2012. V.12. Pp.1717–1719. DOI:10.5194/nhess-12-1717-2012. 29. Masci F. Comment on "Possible association between anomalous geomagnetic variations and the Molise earthquakes at central Italy during 2002" by Takla et al. (2011) // Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 2012. V.202–203. Pp.92–94. DOI:10.1016/j.pepi.2012.02.006. 30. Masci F. On the ULF magnetic ratio increase before the 2008 Iwate–Miyagi Nairiku earthquake by Hirano and Hattori (2011) // J. Asian Earth Sci. 2012. V.56. Pp.258–262. DOI:10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.06.009. 31. Masci F. The study of ionospheric anomalies in Japan area during 1998–2010 by Kon et al.: An inaccurate claim of earthquake-related signatures? // J. Asian Earth Sci. 2012. V.57. Pp.1–5. DOI:10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.06.009. 32. Miyahara S., Tanaka Y., Saita K., Yumoto K., Tachihara H. On ULF magnetic field variations with the Guam earthquake of 8 August 1993 // Atmosphere and Ionospheric Electromagnetic Phenomena Associated With Earthquakes / Ed. by M. Hayakawa. Tokyo: Terra Sci., 1999. Pp.189–201. 33. Molchanov O.A., Kopytenko Yu.A., Voronov P.M., Kopytenko E.A., Matiashvili T.G., Fraser-Smith A.C., Bernardi A. Results of ULF magnetic field measurements near the epicenters of the Spitak (ms = 6.9) and Loma Prieta (ms = 7.1) earthquakes: Comparative analysis // Geophys. Res. Lett. 1992. V.19. No.14. Pp.1495–1498. DOI:10.1029/92GL01152. 34. Moore G.W. Magnetic disturbances preceding the 1964 Alaska earthquake // Nature. 1964. V.203. Pp.508–509. DOI:10.1038/2031106a0. 35. Nagao T., Orihara Y., Kamogawa M. Precursory phenomena possibly related to the 2011 M9.0 off the Pacific coast of Tōhoku earthquake // J. Disaster Res. 2014. V.9. Pp.303–310. 36. Ohta K., Izutsu J., Chekotov A., Hayakawa M. The ULF/ELF electromagnetic radiation before the 11 March 2011 Japanese earthquake // Radio Sci. 2013. V.48. Pp.589–596. DOI:10.1002/rds.20064. 37. Piriyev R.H. The issue of identification of earthquake precursors on magnetotelluric research materials // Problems of Modern Science and Education. 2017. No.21(103). 38. Schekotov A., Hayakawa M. Seismo-meteo-electromagnetic phenomena observed during a 5-year interval around the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake // Phys. Chem. Earth, Parts A/B/C. 2015. DOI:10.106/j.pce.2015.01.010. 39. Schekotov A., Fedorov E., Hobara Y., Hayakawa M. ULF magnetic field depression as a possible precursor to the 2011/3.11 Japan earthquake // J. Atmos. Electr. 2013. V.33. No.1. Pp.41–51. 40. Schekotov A., Fedorov E., Molchanov O.A., Hayakawa M. Low-frequency electromagnetic precursors as a prospect for earthquake prediction // Earthquake Prediction Studies: Seismo Electromagnetics / Ed. by M. Hayakawa. Tokyo: Terra Scientific Publishing, 2013. Pp.81–99. 41. Smirnova N., Hayakawa M., Gotoh K., Volobuev D. Scaling characteristics of the ULF geomagnetic fields at the Guam seismoactive area and their dynamics in relation to the earthquake // Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2001. V.1. Pp.119–126. DOI:10.5194/nhess-1-119-2001. 42. Surkov V., Hayakawa M. Ultra and Extremely Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Field. Tokyo: Springer, 2014. 486 p. 43. Thomas J.N., Love J.J., Johnston M.J.S., Yumoto K. On the reported magnetic precursor of the 1993 Guam earthquake // Geophys. Res. Lett. 2009. V.36. L16301. DOI:10.1029/2009GL039020. 44. Thomas J.N., Love J.J., Johnston M.J.S. On the reported magnetic precursor of the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake // Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 2009. V.173. Pp.207–215. DOI:10.1016/j.pepi.2008.11.014. 45. Xu G., Han P., Huang Q., Hattori K., Febriani F., Yamaguchi H. Anomalous behavior of geomagnetic diurnal variations prior to 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tōhoku earthquake (Mw9.0) // J. Asian Earth Sci. 2013. V.77. Pp.59–65. 46. Yumoto K. et al. A new ULF wave analysis for seismo-electromagnetics using CPMN/MAGDAS data // Phys. Chem. Earth. 2009. V.34. Pp.360–366.

Ссылка на XML

Earthquake precursor studies with electromagnetic monitoring: ULF signals as potential earthquake precursors
Number: 29 Year: 2021 Pages: 30-27

Rahman H. Piriyev¹, e-mail: rahmanpiriyev@bsu.edu.az

Institutions:
1 - Baku State University, Acad. Zahid Khalilov Street, 23, AZ 1148. Baku, Azerbaijan
2 - Socar’s Oil and Gas Research and Design Institute, Baku, Azerbaijan

Abstract
Changes in the electromagnetic (EM) field or EM phenomena prior to an earthquake (EQ) have been attempted to consider as precursors of an EQ by various scientists in different years. Among the studies in this direction, ultra-low frequency (ULF) signals are considered as potential EQ precursors. For this reason, in my research, I have tried to review different papers where ULF signals were considered as perspective signals. In order to do this I looked through the study by Currie and Waters [2014], the study of major EQs (Loma Prieta, and Guam), and the study of mega-earthquake (Tohoku) by different researchers (e.g. Hayakawa and Fujinawa, 1994; Hayakawa, 1996, 1999; Campbell, 2009; Fraser-Smith et al., 2011; Molchanov et al., 1992; Hobara et al., 2004; Ida et al., 2005; Surkov and Hayakawa, 2014). In the end, I came to the conclusion that the ULF EM approach should be considered as the best approach to studying EQs or to predict EQs (short-term prediction).

Keywords: ELECTROMAGNETIC, EARTHQUAKE, ULF, PRECURSOR, SHORT-TERM PREDICTION

Information about sources of financing: -